COM447

pageicon Friday Jun 08, 2007

Walt Disney Conglomerate

Earlier in the week, we discussed and disagreed with Featherstone?s theory of an emerging global culture. Many countries and cultures around the world are rejecting ideas and products from other regions, and particularly from Western cultures. However, that doesn?t seem to be stopping large, western corporations from forming global markets.

            Pieces of the Walt Disney Company can be found in almost every region of the world. Besides the many television, film, internet and cellular phone entities that Disney owns and controls, they?ve also built their Magic Kingdoms in numerous countries around the globe. It is not at all unusual to see children in Hong Kong, Mexico, or India wearing a T-shirt featuring any number of Disney characters ranging from Mickey Mouse to Pocahontas. ?American influence is growing, it's so easy to get access to US culture; there are no barriers. Disney is known worldwide now ( Rice-Oxley, 2004).?  No other cartoon character in the world is as recognizable as the seventy-nine year old mouse in little red shorts and big yellow shoes. Disney has even received awards from various nations around the globe. ?There are dozens of medals, citations, and plaques from appreciative governments attesting the international amity created by Disney?s make-believe characters? (De Roos, p. 48)?

            Disney has linked itself to countless cultures around the globe, and linking those cultures to each other, at least in that one respect, to form a global Disney culture. Even countries who cannot currently lay claim to their own Disneyland theme park, such as various African nations, are featured in the signature musical ride ?It?s a Small World After All.? However, Disney can also lay a meager claim to bringing world cultures to Americans. The Disney World theme park in Orlando, Florida features an attraction known as the World Showcase. Countries from Mexico to Morocco are represented, and tourists can sample the cultures? cuisine, watch informational videos, buy their imported products, learn their folklore, and interact with citizens of those countries. Every employee in the World Showcase is a citizen of the country they are representing at Disney World.

            By Hardt and Negri?s definition, Disney may not quite have formed a global Empire through their entertainment media conglomerate. Instead, they are more likely to create the type of imperial empire reminiscent of modern European nations. Their theme parks are their colonies. They ship their products to and from their colonies to various part of the globe, and few people in the developed word have not heard of Walt Disney.

           

References

 

Featherstone, M. (1990). Global culture: an introduction. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global culture: Nationalism, globalization, and modernity. London; Newbury Park

 

De Roos, R. (1963). The magic worlds of Walt Disney. In E. Smoodin, Disney Discourse: Producing the Magic Kingdom. New York; Routledge

 

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio (2000). ?Preface? (pp.xi-xvii) and Part I (pp. 1-66), Empire. Cambridge, MA, and London, England: Harvard University Press.

Rice-Oxley, M. (2004). In 2000 years, will the world remember Disney or Plato? Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved June 6, 2007 from http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/analysis/2004/0115plato.htm

Comments:

I agree with your points, but also think that Disney fits the definition of Empire well because it is not location based. It has spread worldwide without having to have any kind of based location, even though the theme parks act as such. People in all different countries know about Disney without actually having to go to one of the theme parks.

Posted by Christina Kellmann on June 08, 2007 at 12:32 PM EDT #

What about Tomlinson's article!? It specifically talks about Disney characters and how they transfer values of American consumer capitalism to countries around the world. I think this would have been especially good to include in your writing here. Also, it seems that one of your main points is that Disney is like a colonial Empire because they ship merchandise globally. What does that have to do with communication? I don't mean to sound harsh with my comments but I think that you make some great points about how one of the main draws of Disney parks is that they feature things from cultures all over the world. It would have been good if you could have included some of the stuff I mentioned earlier to see how it stands up to your points here.

Posted by Chris Bigelow on June 08, 2007 at 02:18 PM EDT #

** I started this response but in the mean time another comment was posted**

You made a lot of good points. There were definitely unique perspectives that I don't know that I would necessarily have connected myself. May be something to think about for next week could be analyzing a particular Disney movie, like Tarzan for example. And you could look at how that movie was packaged for an American audience. I think that could be a good example of localization. Also, I think it is really interesting that Disney which is supposedly this sort of global "Empire" has yet to put out a film based upon black characters. I think that would be a really interesting topic to research, especially as it applies to localization in black America.

Posted by Tisha on June 08, 2007 at 03:26 PM EDT #

When you think about Disney World the image that pops into most peoples mind is the Magic Kingdom. This is Disney World?s largest and most popular theme park with all the them park rides and Cinderella?s Castle.

Posted by state.p.r. on October 07, 2008 at 11:38 AM EDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: Allowed

« November 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
     
       
Today

Feeds

Search this blog

Links

Weblog menu