Posting Group Due 2/29 @ 3PM

Architecture:

HINES JASON SCOTT             

HORA REBECCA ANN              
JACKSON CAMILLE E             
JI SEUNGHUAN SR               
JOLLEYS ERIKA                 
JONES JILLIAN BROOKE          
KILBY RYAN PAUL               
KIRSCH MAGGIE ELAINE          
LLUCH ROCIO                   
LOPES ELIANE MANDU            
MASON LECHASTIN JAVONTE'      
MCCLURE KYLER ANNE            
MCDONOUGH EILEEN              

Comments [1]

Trackback URL: http://blogs.lib.ncsu.edu/D100/entry/posting_group_due_2_29
Comments:

Designers should always be prepared to have their work be interpreted in different ways. The Feral Robot can be considered a success because people were able to take the artifact (toy) and transform it into a very useful tool. The fact that Natalia Jerenijinko developed sensors and put them on the toy in order to gather information about toxins should not be considered a bad thing. The designer should feel proud that the toy can be used in a way which can help people to search for toxins and perhaps many others environmental problems. I believe that as designers we should always feel proud of our work if it benefits our society in any respect. Designers should always be prepared to have their artifacts changed and used for different purposes as long it is a good purpose. The designer can use these changes to his or her own benefit and improve the initial design to fit other purposes as well.
In the case of the Feral Robot, the designer should engage himself in the idea and perhaps develop a new design of the toy to better fit Natalia?s idea. When ideas are combined they usually have a great result where everyone wins. Designers should always be open to new ideas and changes that can improve or create a new function for their artifacts.

Posted by Elliane Mandu Lopes on February 29, 2008 at 11:48 AM EST #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: Allowed