Looks good, the poster is very attractive at first glance. I like the way the graphs divide the poster into the two sections. Nice schematic of seagrass vs. epiphyte etc.
Improvements
-Stick to one format for bullets - fragments or sentences to assist with flow
-explain what an epiphyte is for people who don't know and use grazer or epiphyte because the switching is confusing
- be explicit such as T. testudinum is seagrass and what might be an epiphyte etc.
- in the model section explain the model and then be clear about what changes you made (P and herbivory pressure) which is not clear on first glance
-in the assumptions section the relationship between biomass and grazer population is not clear to me; is this constant or a proportion, etc.
Posted by
Sharon
on December 06, 2007 at 12:53 AM EST
#
![[This is a Roller site]](http://blogs.lib.ncsu.edu/EffectivePosters/resource/images/roller-logo.gif){kind=logo}
Looks good, the poster is very attractive at first glance. I like the way the graphs divide the poster into the two sections. Nice schematic of seagrass vs. epiphyte etc.
Improvements
-Stick to one format for bullets - fragments or sentences to assist with flow
-explain what an epiphyte is for people who don't know and use grazer or epiphyte because the switching is confusing
- be explicit such as T. testudinum is seagrass and what might be an epiphyte etc.
- in the model section explain the model and then be clear about what changes you made (P and herbivory pressure) which is not clear on first glance
-in the assumptions section the relationship between biomass and grazer population is not clear to me; is this constant or a proportion, etc.
Posted by Sharon on December 06, 2007 at 12:53 AM EST #