« November 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
     
       
Today
20080731 Thursday July 31, 2008

Course Management Systems: Bad Pedagogical Practice?

There is an interesting article in Educause called "Toolbox or Trap: Course Management Systems and Pedagogy" by Lisa Lane from MiraCosta College.

http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/ToolboxorTrapCourseManage/46576

In summary, the argument is that most commercial Course Management Systems (CMS)* hamper the development of sound pedagogical practices in online teaching.  She makes a lot of valid points like:
  • They can force an unnatural structure to your course
  • Creativity in pedagogical design is sacrificed for efficiency
  • Faculty don't know what all the possibilities are with a particular CMS
However, CMSes should not always serve as our scapegoats.  There are a couple of things to keep in mind about CMSes.
  • CMSes have significantly lowered the barrier to entry for creating web based resources.  When you deal with having to move an entire university's courses online, as opposed to a single faculty member's course, you have to think of scalability.  The online teaching  adoption rate could not be matched if we were limited to teaching only HTML publishing for creating web content.
  • FERPA and accessibility issues are not always adequately addressed in third-party web applications.  Granted some CMSes have a ways to go with accessibility issues as well.
  • The problem is not the technology, it is the way it is used.  I work extensively with Blackboard Vista (one of her examples of a bad CMS) and Moodle (one of her examples of a good CMS), and I can make either one of them behave pretty much like the other one.  There is some functionality and usability that is lost on BOTH sides of the equation between the two systems, but at the end of the day I can do most of the same things in both.  (Just for the record I do prefer Moodle, but there is some functionality I miss from Vista.)
I think some of her critique is really that CMSes cannot be everything to everybody.  Part of basic software design is that you cannot include every feature that everyone wants.  If you do the system becomes unusable.  For those who want to be more creative in their pedagogy I would recommend a different solution.

CMSes have tremendously helped progress the development and use of online resources in teaching.  They have also given us an opportunity to discuss new teaching strategies with faculty.  Isn't this called the "teachable moment" and isn't it what we educators yearn for?  By the way, have you ever tried to change anything in academia before?  Patience is a virtue, and baby steps are a necessity.

Greg


*CMSes are also referred to as Learning Management Systems (LMS)

Posted by gdkraus ( Jul 31 2008, 10:39:43 PM EDT ) Permalink Comments [2]
Comments:

Excellent post Greg!

Posted by James on July 31, 2008 at 12:24 PM EDT #

Couldn't agree with you more about your opinion on this article. Some of the arguments presented by the author are far-fetched, like calling discussions and student-teacher interaction "managerial." Some of them are good points, like the availability of free Web 2.0 tools that can be incorporated to help teachers teach and learners learn.

But in general I can relate about the scapegoating thought, and I'm reminded of a more classic example of blaming PowerPoint for problems in teaching. Of course, PowerPoint can be used very effectively, it's all a matter of the user's level of expertise/creativity. This isn't to say that the PowerPoint and Vista and Moodle don't have their limitations and bugs, but I think that they are exaggerated at times - like in this article.

Posted by Charlie on August 05, 2008 at 02:04 PM EDT #

Post a Comment:

Comments are closed for this entry.