Thursday August 24, 2006 | The Horseless Library Digital Library Discussions |
|
Some recent interesting blog posts elsewhere about digital library issues Three recent posts on other blogs dealt with digital librarianship and issues that have been written about by several of us here over the summer including networked books, Google's digitization program, and digital presses in the academy. All three are better written than the average blog post, are not rants (imho) and make for decent reading. That's because no sane librarian would outsource their profession to an Strong stuff, especially that last sentence. unaccountable private entity that refuses to disclose the workings of its system ? in other words, how does Google's book algorithm work, how are the search results ranked? And yet so many librarians are behind this plan. Am I to conclude that they've all gone insane? Or are they just so anxious about the pace of technological change, driven to distraction by fears of obsolescence and diminishing reach, that they are willing to throw their support uncritically behind the company, who, like a frontier huckster, promises miracle cures and grand visions of universal knowledge? Meanwhile, over at Inside Higher Education, Scott Palmer posted a trenchant critique of If: Book itself and its recent high profile activities. http://insidehighered.com/views/2006/08/15/palmer I can't help but smile when Palmer says : "Still, when one filters out the soul-deadening jargon about ?authentic He also caught my attention when he argued:learning opportunities,? ?self-reflexivity,? ?mediated environments,? etc. that permeates their posts, it?s clear that the blog?s authors and readers are thinking creatively and earnestly (although rather pretentiously) about the prospects of the digital age in transforming academic writing." "the emphasis that contributors to if:book seem to place on the ?transparency? of scholarship and ?immediacy? of publication made possible by digital delivery misses a very important point...One can build a convincing case that, in the current age of instant analysis, self-absorbed ?experts,? and ubiquitous 24/7 live blog feeds, the last thing that the academy needs is to embrace transparency and immediacy." Finally, IHE also had an article a bit ago that dealt with digital publishing and blogs. http://insidehighered.com/views/2006/07/12/mclemee The articles revolves around the question "But will urging university presses to think more seriously about blogs
Posted by WARREN, SCOTT
| Aug 24 2006, 03:08:26 PM EDT
| Permalink
|
(and other new media forms) really offer a solution? Or does it just compound the problem? Hearing from readers over the past week, I?ve started to wonder." |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||