Monday April 28, 2008 Self Reflection
I felt in my call to action speech i made a clear point that action was needed for conservation. I proposed that supporting Ducks Unlimited would definately be a small step towards making our way towards a better place. My persuasive tactics was to describe what the problem is and how and to what extent that the problem seems to be exceeding too. I used a statement from the wildlife conservation association. Which basically said that one person can make a difference. Also I believe that I did make a connection with the audience and that they had a good understanding of what was going on.
Posted by sbnorris ( Apr 28 2008, 04:50:19 PM EDT ) Permalink Comments [0]Self-Reflection
In my persuasive speech i felt that i made my arguments pretty clear, but the audience may have not had a clear understanding of the topic i proposed. I believe that i could have gave less supporting evidence of Ducks Unlimited and used clearer evidence towards wetland conservation and the need. Using more statistics may have helped with understanding and getting the point to the audience. I used much evidence in describing the urbanization of much of the wetlands. Most contractors and developers would definately have an opposition to this. I think that the persuasive strategies i used maybe could have been stronger as to help in weakening committment. I used the strategy of describing what it would be like if everyone gave their help and support and the differences that it would make.
Posted by sbnorris ( Apr 28 2008, 04:38:40 PM EDT ) Permalink Comments [0]Reviewer-Seth Norris
Reviewed-Tony Wahula
Tony made his point very clear and let us know that there was a need for an action against this. His proposal was very specific in asking us to make an effort not to fall into the system of sports gambling. He used clear arugmentation and evidence about his topic. Especially when he was refering to the points shaving that many college athletes seem to be fallin into causing the difference in wins and losses.
Reviewer-Seth Norris
Reviewed-Tyler Lassiter
Tyler started off his speech very strong with support against abortions and the need to stop them. He explained his problem very well and what could be done. He used statistics and supporting evidence to provide a convincing statement. He directly used good supporting evidence by refering to how the great athletes and people might possibly be being killed by abortions and never to be seen. He used clarity very well for providing his main point.
Posted by sbnorris ( Apr 28 2008, 04:26:09 PM EDT ) Permalink Comments [0]Seth - Protect Wetlands
1. very well, in the intro the speaker quickly got to the point and stated the need well
2. described what could be done but did not specifically say, you should do this
3. the speaker used these strategies well, especially in his description of the problems in wetlands
4. "strip a native forest"
5. vividness was used well, the speaker also used pauses very well
6. the speaker obviously cared about his subject and had a forceful delivery, he energized the audience well
Tyler - Anti-Abortion
1. the speaker was clear that there is a need for action against abortion
2. the actions were specific
3. the speaker used specific examples and generalization well
4. "out of these statistics how many lives could you have saved?"
5. the speaker used clarity especially well
6. the speaker's style energized the audience well
Posted by jsbartuc ( Apr 26 2008, 05:23:55 PM EDT ) Permalink Comments [0]1. I thought that I illustated my need very clearly
2. My actions were very specific and the audience had a good sense of what they could do and how they could do it
3. I used persuasive strategies well, I used a peer reviewed source to help back up my claim and I appealed to my audience's logic
4. The words I used that spoke most to my audience were, "do this so that women can finally be seen as equals in a world dominated by men"
5. I used linguistic stategies well, however I have a problem with tripping over my words and my rate could use improvement. I rush some sections but then slow down in others.
6. My style energized the audience well, it was obvious to me that I had the full attention of the majority of the class
Posted by jsbartuc ( Apr 26 2008, 05:12:20 PM EDT ) Permalink Comments [0]I was pleased with my topic on immigration. I feel that it is a great topic that our nation face today and is somewhat controversial. I relied on my persuasion speech to formulate my call to action speech. I feel that I adequately demonstrated immigration as a problem that faces our society. I believed that I had resourceful evidence to support my claims. I used the upcoming election as an event for call to action because politicians have a great persuasion in deciding our laws and how things should be run. However, the people of America have a heavy "say so" in who becomes elected. Overall I felt that I meet the requirements for a call to action speech. I proposed the issue as a solution and then induced a specific action that went along with my topic. On the negative side, I might have been able to provide a more specific action that was I proposed but I thought it was legitimate event to compensate for the problem of immigration. Overall I felt that I did a good job.
Posted by hjbrendl ( Apr 25 2008, 04:36:36 PM EDT ) Permalink Comments [0]I think, apart from reading from the note cards too much, I did a good job. I presented a clear need for action on making students study abroad and become more aware of global issues and the rest of the world. I think my statistics hit home with the audience, making them realize how little the average American knows about the United States and the rest of the world. It's pretty scary. I clearly presented my actions of exploring study abroad options at NC State, then picking the right one for the individual, going on the study abroad and then telling friends about this experience and encouraging friends to also study abroad. From there, the university would see this popularity and notice it. Eventually, with everyone's help and effort, it would be mandatory for students to study abroad for at least one semester before they graduate. In my speech, I tried to use a lot of unifying words and phrases to connect myself with the audience and help it see that I needed everyone's help to help our university and our nation. I told of what a great experience seeing the world would be, I forgot to mention, however, how it would put them, as individuals, ahead in the work force. I went over on my time, nothing new, and I read from my note cards too much. Lack of preparation. My fault. Overall, though, I think I connected with the audience and showed them they need to take action to help globalize our university and nation and get ahead in the globalization craze of the 21st century.
Posted by lelehman ( Apr 25 2008, 11:05:47 AM EDT ) Permalink Comments [0] Brandee caught the audience's attention from the start with
a powerful, captivating antidote. She explained how a family member was in
danger of her ex-husband and how she had to get a restraining order to keep her
safe. Then she said she wished there was more than a piece of paper to keep her
safe: she was calling us to action of having the personal right to bear arms
for extra protection! The right to bear arms is a protection devise that could
benefit most people in their daily lives. Her actions to succeed in this right
were very specific. First, she wanted to generate a change in public opinion
from a negative to positive viewpoint on the right to bear arms. We, as the
audience, could help her do this by educating others about the positive sides
of baring arms. Next, she urged to change to second amendment of individual
right for protection against criminals. She gave many statistics and stories to
why it is important for women especially to have the protection they need
against criminals and how many lives would be saved and crimes not committed it
people had the personal right to bear arms. Self defense would minimize crimes
and maximize personal safety. She used excellent diction to energize the
audience like together, we can be a "pounding force" and
"protecting safety" is a great concern. She used these phrases
throughout the speech. Great job, Brandee! Only one thing to critique: you
seemed to be attached to the counter for most of the speech. I think you'd be
so much more effective if you walked around and connected with the audience by
getting us involved too. Other than that, excellent!
Chelsea's call to action to help starving North Ugandan children made the audience sympathize with her and the children. She clearly expressed how badly these children are suffering and introduced a few simple actions we could take to improve the lives of an entire community. She gave actions for all types of people: just the knowledge of these children would make some people want to help, awareness is always a good thing. Others could donate to the many different groups set up to help the children, the extremists could organize an event to help raise awareness or attend those already in order, and finally, we could contact member of congress and express our concern for these children, hoping they could do something to help. After giving us all this information, Chelsea again pointed out how badly these children were suffering and how we should help them in any way we could. She wanted us to feel sorry for the kids, and she was successful for me. Her conclusion was good, she wrapped it up by going back to her introduction, making it a circular speech and it was very effective. One piece of advice, however, she seemed kind of tense and nervous (she usually didn't in her previous speeches) I wish she could have chilled out a bit. Overall, great way to wrap up the semester and great speech!
Posted by lelehman ( Apr 25 2008, 10:44:40 AM EDT ) Permalink Comments [0]