Phase change in the early universe
Nov. 09, 2009
When the universe began, it was very, very hot. The temperature was much greater than the ionization energy of hydrogen (then, as now, the most common form of baryonic matter), so protons and electrons were dissociated and electromagnetic radiation could propagate freely. As the universe expanded, it cooled, and eventually the temperature dropped below the ionization energy. Protons and electrons combined to make neutral hydrogen, which is opaque to electromagnetic radiation. So began what in astrophysics is called the "Dark Ages". As the universe cooled further, though, the first stars formed and began to pump out prodigious amounts of energy--enough to reionize the hydrogen of the universe and make it transparent to light once again. Though there are no current methods for studying the first phase transition (light to dark), we do have ways to probe the second phase transition of the universe (dark to light).
This paper by an entire page of authors, submitted to Nature, discusses one such attempt. Gamma-ray bursts are the most luminous events in the known universe, second only to the Big Bang itself. They are bright enough, in fact, that we expect to be able to observe them all the way back to reionization, which began at a redshift of z = 11 (meaning the universe was 11 times smaller than it is at present, at an age of just 400 million years). The gamma-ray burst 090423 currently holds the record for most distant object ever observed, at a redshift of 8.2. This is during the reionization period, and comparison with other very distant gamma-ray bursts, particularly in the UV spectrum (which is what 13.6eV-photons fall into), should offer a lot of information about the phase state of the universe as it changed from opaque to transparent.
As far as I'm aware, this is the most significant phase change in astrophysics/cosmology, because understanding the properties of the reionization constrains the formation rate of stars and galaxies in the early universe. In addition, the presence or absence of gamma-ray bursts impacts our models of the evolution of vary large, metal-poor (i.e. almost entirely hydrogen and helium) stars--do they age and die with a bang, or with something else altogether?
If you were planning on reading the paper, please don't be scared off by the size. Of the 41 pages in the PDF, the first three are authors and affiliations, and the actual paper ends at page 9. And it's double-spaced.