Albert Einstein disproves the existence of Vulcan
Nowadays debate about the number of planets in
our solar system revolves around arguing about exactly which of the
slightly-larger-than-average icy bodies should be included in the count.
Also, if you talk about the planet Vulcan, it is assumed you are simply a
harmless Star Trek nerd referring to the homeworld of a fictional race of
emotionless humanoids.
Consider a time when neither of those things were true. Consider the 19th
century.
In the 1840s, French astronomer Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier began applying
Newtonian dynamics to the problems of planetary orbits. After noticing a
discrepancy between his calculations and the direct observations of Uranus, he
predicted that Uranus was being gravitationally affected by another more
distant planet. He was even able to predict where it was in its orbit
before it was observed. In 1846, Neptune was discovered where foreseen,
lending credence to both Le Verrier and Newton.
In the 1850s, feeling emboldened by his historic prediction, Le Verrier turned
his sights on the other planets. Similar to the perturbations he noticed
in Uranus's orbit, he also found problems with Mercury, the innermost planet in
the solar system. He concluded that there must be another planet even
closer to the sun disturbing Mercury's orbit. He named it Vulcan (after
the Roman God of Fire).
I won't draw it out here. For decades he and others searched for Vulcan
without success. Le Verrier and other astronomers who supported the
Vulcan theory died convinced it would be found.
So what happened? Le Verrier had applied Newtons's laws correctly.
If the theory is correct, the outcome must be predictable, yet the prediction
in this case ultimately failed. Had Newton been wrong about gravitational
laws?
Nah. It just didn't account for everything. Turns out the
inconsistencies between observation and prediction were actually a relativistic
effect:
The advance of Mercury's perihelion was
brilliantly explained by Albert Einstein in November 1915 at his desk in Berlin
-- his general theory of relativity finally exorcised the ghost of Vulcan from the inner solar system. Einstein
presented a new theory of gravitation that conceived of it as a warping of the
fabric of space-time. According to his theory, Mercury should precess slightly
faster than the Newtonian rate -- by 0.1 arcseconds for each orbital revolution
of the planet, or 43 arc-seconds per century. This agreed exactly with the
observed rate. Vulcan became redundant.*
Unfortunately Le Verrier
didn't know about relativity, and spent a good portion of his professional life
trying to work on a problem that demanded its contributions.
*Excerpted from "Vulcan
Chasers" by William Sheehan and Richard Baum, Astronomy, volume 25, issue 12 (December 1997).
Read more of the story there, or the wikipedia article here.
Posted at 06:40PM Jul 25, 2006 by WILSON, JOSHUA in Anecdotes | Comments[3]
Consider a time when neither of those things were true. Consider the 19th century.
Such dramatic storytelling!
(Your stupid 8 + 47 math question almost tripped me up.)
Posted by srah on July 25, 2006 at 07:08 PM EDT #
If I don't find the comments constructive enough, I'll start asking people to complete elliptical integrals instead.
Posted by Josh on July 25, 2006 at 07:38 PM EDT #
I don't even know what that means!
(Easy one this time: 2+98!)
Posted by srah on July 27, 2006 at 10:39 AM EDT #