Monday November 02, 2009 | Fully Myelinated Politics, Science, Miscellany |
|
Trackback URL: http://blogs.lib.ncsu.edu/shgreene/entry/juvenile_justice
Comments:
Post a Comment: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Supreme Court heard two cases this past week on the issue of whether giving life sentences to juveniles for crimes other than murder violates the Constitution's 8th amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. One of the cases involves a defendant who was 13 when he was sentenced to life in prison without parole. Apparently, this is very much a Florida issue:
Had quite a good discussion of this going on my on-line class discussion for Public Policy. Firstly, on a practical level, this policy is just incredibly stupid. Do you really want to make a determination that someone is hopelessly beyond redemption from actions they took when they are 13? Seriously-- that is just moronic. What a waste of state resources locking someone up forever because of something they did when they were a young teenager. As for the Constitutional issue, I'm definitely going with cruel and unusual. As readers of this blog presumably know, I'm a believer that brain science should matter in these things (of course, the name of the blog reflects this). Juvenile brains are quite simply physically immature (not fully myelinated in the prefrontal cortex) in the part that is responsible for judgment. In a sense, they are impaired. When somebody's brain is impaired we don't hold them fully legally responsible for their actions. Punished? yes; life in prison with no parole? no.
Posted by shgreene ( Nov 02 2009, 08:44:49 AM EST ) Permalink Comments [0]